tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 16 20:18:34 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Confusion and unconditional surrender (was: vocabulary..)

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: Confusion and unconditional surrender (was: vocabulary..)
• Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 23:17:56 -0500

Holtej writes:
>..."In complex sentences of this type
>[sentence as object], the second verb never takes an aspect suffix
>(section 4.2.7)".  Aspect needs to come from the verb in the sentence
>which is the object of /qaS/.

I actually did remember that rule, but I remembered it backwards, alas.
Thank you for straightening me out.  I find that I usually need to have
a mistake corrected three times before I can consistently do it right.

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: Crazy
• Next by Date: Re: Big translation.
• Prev by thread: Re: Confusion and unconditional surrender (was: vocabulary..)
• Next by thread: Re: Confusion and unconditional surrender (was: vocabulary..)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level