tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 24 06:58:42 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Klingon syllable structure



On Wed, 24 May 1995 09:27:56 -0400, "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]> said:

> Someone just recently posted the phonology rules, but here's a summary,
> as I understand them. A Klingon syllable consists of a consonant,
> followed by a vowel, followed by a consonant.  The final consonant is
> optional.  The first consonant is optional in non-initial syllables,
> such as the suffix {-oy}, although syllables without the first
> consonant are rare. 

I don't think there is sufficient support for this last statement.

First, to say `non-initial syllables, such as the suffix {-oy}' is
to imply that you know, or at least expect, that there are others
like {-oy}.  In reality {-oy} is our only example of a morpheme
which is not a well-formed syllable (or a sequence of well-formed
syllables), and, for aught we know, it may well be the only such
morpheme existing in the language.

Second, at least if the root ends in a consonant, {-oy} does not
create a vowel-initial syllable: neither {va-voy} nor {tar-ghoy}
contain one.  There would be a vowel-initial syllable in {tI-oy},
but Okrand explicitly says that this most likely does not happen;
his own guess (not confirmed by Maltz yet) is {tI-'oy}.

So I think the first consonant is obligatory.

--'Iwvan


Back to archive top level