tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 15 23:12:41 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: a question

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: a question
• Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 02:11:24 -0400

>HIch vIlo' baHtaH jIH

I favor  the <-meH> plus <lo'> construction just the way Chinese Mandarin
handles this.  CM has no prepositions either.

Thus:  vIbaHmeH HIch vIlo'

In your own construction, <vIbaHtaH>  needs to replace <baHtaH jIH>.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: muchenmoH DISmey
• Next by Date: Re: {n/ng-a-'/gh/H}
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: a question
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: a question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level