tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 10 19:25:20 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: What did she say?
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: What did she say?
- Date: Wed, 10 May 95 22:25:17 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "David Barron" at May 10, 95 10:17 am
According to David Barron:
>
> At 02:37 AM 5/10/95 -0400, MR NATHAN B CLARK wrote:
> >Steve Weaver ([email protected]) said:
> >
> >> Now for the REAL question which begs to be asked, which one was the
> >REAL BABE??
> >
> >> a) The full Klingon B'Elanna
> >> b) The 1/2 Klingon B'Elanna
> >> c) The full Human B'Elanna
I think I'm too much of a liberated SuvwI' to discuss the
relative babe-itude of women. I prefer to keep my lusts more
discreet. I find that all this repression tends to make
opportunities for exceptions to be all the more profound.
...
> >I'd have to say the 1/2 Klingon B'Elanna is still _the_ babe.
>
> ghobe', ghobe'! petaQpu'!
> tera'ngan B'Elanna ghap tlhIngan B'lanna vImaSqu'.
Conjunctions FOLLOW the nouns they join, unless you are from
the same lowly province which spawned the captain in ST5...
> 'ach tlhIngan loDpu' ngarghchugh tera'ngan be'pu'
> ghorlaH tera'ngan be'pu'.
Is {ngargh} the same word as {nga'}?
chaq nga'chuqtaHvIS tlhIngan loD tera'ngan be' je be'
ghormoHbe'meH loD yepnIS loD, 'ach nga'taHvIS tlhIngan be' Qob
law' Hoch Qob puS!
> mISqu' tera'ngan bID-tlhIngan bID B'Elanna.
jISaHbe'. 'IHqu' 'ej nongqu' 'ej HoSghajqu'. latlhpu'
wISuvtaHvIS mutlhejchugh, vaj jIHem. batlh Qu''a'Daj vIta'qang.
jup neHchugh, vaj jupDaj jIH. wIvmeH tlhab ghaj. wIvDaj vIlaj.
> David Barron
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |