tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 03 20:12:47 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum

• From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
• Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 20:12:24 -0800 (PST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Fri, 3 Mar 1995 [email protected] wrote:

> If we could use *wa'* as a verb:  wa'choH [qo'] law'

How about:  wa' chenmoH law'wI'.
or:  wa' moj law'wI'.

yoDtargh

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: jIwuq versus tIn jIH
• Next by Date: Re: To: Wouter Re: qagh, Romulan Ale and ro'qegh'Iwchab -reply
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level