tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 27 19:16:12 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: (n) orbit?



According to Alan Anderson:
> 
> I've been following the {bav} as noun discussion...

>     {Don} = (v) parallel, be parallel, go parallel to
>   {HeDon} = (n) parallel course
>      {He} = (n) course, route
...
>     {bav} = (v) orbit
> I suggest we consider the possibility that
>   {Hebav} = (n) orbital course or path        ** proposed new word

After Okrand approves it, I'd be glad to use this word. Of
course, access to the man is limited, since he is quite busy,
and there's already a number of other answers we'd like to get
from him, but the man does answer us over time. We did finally
get {-ghach} explained to us with a useful level of detail,
after all...

Still, this is a noun-verb combination, and Okrand can do that.
The rest of us can't. As this kind of illegal word combination
goes, this sounds like a more reasonable one, but again, it is
one Okrand needs to approve.

> I'm proposing a newly _discovered_ word, of course, not a newly _invented_ one! :-)

Only Okrand can discover. We can only invent, and even then,
only by the noun-noun construction rules given in TKD, and even
then, we rarely come up with words that don't make most of us
wince.

> If we stretch just a little, we might try to use {bav} as an adjective.
>     {bav} = (v) orbit, be an orbit            ** proposed extension to definition

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwww! pay' 'oH yIHoH! yIH rur 'oH!

> Then {He bav} would do just fine without needing an entirely new word.

But then, {bav} would BE an entirely new word. What you want is
{bavbogh He}. The object of {bav} would then be the thing the
path orbits. Of course, then you are building towards a very
English sounding {tera' bavbogh He'e' vIghoS} instead of much
simpler, concise and direct {tera' vIbav.}

> nuq bIQub?

.......

> -- ghunchu'wI'
> 
> 

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |


Back to archive top level