tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 21 07:55:12 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingons conquer Worlds Chat (sort of...)
- From: "Christian Matzke" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingons conquer Worlds Chat (sort of...)
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 10:59:51 -0500
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: "Christian Matzke" <[email protected]>
On 21 Dec 95 at 0:44, [email protected] <[email protected]>
wrote:
> In a message dated 95-12-20 11:16:37 EST, you write:
>
> >How could you say "he enjoyed nga'chuq", etc? The only similar
> >thing is the pronoun 'e', which can only be an object... but that's
> >a pronoun/chuvmey, not a noun.
>
> Will we be allowed to use {SeloH} (n) = sex? It is from a novel,
> apparently, as posted by tlheghmeQ a few days ago.
Actually, it was from TNG Sins of the Father. The STE gave it as
seloh (sex)
Susan Farmer says:
When Picard goes to see Kahlest, and mentions K'mpec. She says she knows
K'mpec, that he had an eye for the ladies and he wanted SeloH with her.
But once again, I must ask, what is the KLI's policy on words from
other sources?
maSqa'
> peHruS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Had I not known that I was dead already,
I would have mourned the loss of my life"
-Ota Dokan, Japanese poet
(written while a knife protruded from his chest)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~