tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 20 10:26:40 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingons conquer Worlds Chat (sort of...)
- From: "Christian Matzke" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingons conquer Worlds Chat (sort of...)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 13:31:19 -0500
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: "Christian Matzke" <[email protected]>
On 20 Dec 95 at 8:15, Mark E. Shoulson <[email protected]> wrote:
I wrote:
> >> >cyber sex: nga'chuqqoq
> >>
> >> Isn't nga'chuq a verb?
> >Uh, it says in HolQeD 1:3 "sex (i.e., perform sex; always SUBJECT)"
> >my emphasis. I don't see how a verb could be the subject of a
> >sentance. HOWEVER, since it clearly has a verbal suffix on it and
> >4:2:9 says "verbs ending in suffixes... can never be nouns" it's a
> >bit hinky. Since we have ngagh (v) then I don't think we need
> >nga'chuq as a verb too.
>
> I don't really agree. Bear in mind that "ngagh" came out much after
> nga'chuq. Look at the definition of nga'chuq: "i.e. perform sex".
> Plainly a *verbal* definition. You would never define a noun by
> explaining that it means "to perform" something. I interpret the
> "always subject" comment to mean that the actors involved must
> always be the subjects of the verb, not one the subject and one the
> object (to emphasize what should be plain from the "-chuq" suffix).
> That is, to say that Maltz has sex with Mara, I need to say
> "nga'chuq matlh mara je", and not make one the subject and the other
> the object (or object of a preposition as in English). It would be
> very strange if it meant that "nga'chuq" was a noun that could never
> be an object. How could you say "he enjoyed nga'chuq", etc? The
> only similar thing is the pronoun 'e', which can only be an
> object... but that's a pronoun/chuvmey, not a noun.
Now I see where you are coming from. I believe I also may have found
the source of my confusion. In HolQeD 3:2 page 13 Jonathan Van Hoose
asked how to use nga'chuq in a sentence since it must always be the
subject. He went on to say he had never seen a verb that would fit
that construction. I now see that both Jon and I were mistaken. Your
take on the word is much clearer. However, that does leave us without
a noun for sex...
> ~mark
maSqa'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Had I not known that I was dead already,
I would have mourned the loss of my life"
-Ota Dokan, Japanese poet
(written while a knife protruded from his chest)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~