tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 18 07:27:42 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qaqIHneS !
- From: david barron <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qaqIHneS !
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 08:27:33 -0700 (MST)
At 10:21 PM 12/17/95 -0800, you wrote:
>In a message dated 95-12-17 15:09:47 EST, you write:
>
>>Here's another of the rare cases where Klingon must use a noun to express
>>what an English verb means. Try {"Indiana"Daq 'oH juHwIj'e'}.
>>
>>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
>I really like the construction you just suggested.
HIja' jIH je jay'.
This I like even better than my <*Idaho*Daq jISaHtaH> (baring the
absence of <-taH> that should follow <'oH>.
Out of all the suggestions <"Indiana"Daq 'oHtaH juHwIj'e'> is about as
unambigous as you get.
>
>peHruS
>
david
David Barron [email protected]
Klingon Language Postal Course, PO Box 37, Eagle ID 83616
It's FREE! Send Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope.
Not available by E-mail, so dont ask.