tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 16 11:22:50 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Win 95 "Klingon-ized"
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Win 95 "Klingon-ized"
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:22:19 -0500
In a message dated 95-12-15 08:12:21 EST, you write:
>Okay, this blows my complaint out of the water. The sentence
>{Qo'noSDaq qagh Sop SuvwI' Hoch} indeed is ambiguous; both of
>the interpretations are grammatical. "All warriors eat worms
>on Kronos" and "On Kronos, all warriors eat worms" both work.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
>
>
>
I reiterate that have available the Noun Suffix Type 5 {-'e'}, "topicalizer"
to specify Objects as well as Subjects. If we must specify that the worms
are what are on Kronos, try {Qo'noSDaq qagh'e' Sop SuvwI' Hoch}.
Next subject: Can I infer that {qagh} is inherently plural?
peHruS