tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 08 13:06:42 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {-bogh} vs {-meH}
- From: Adam Walker <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {-bogh} vs {-meH}
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 15:01:58 -0600
- Organization: Dallas Baptist University
> Date sent: 8-Dec-95 13:32:39 -0600
> From: SHOULSON @ INTERNET (Mark E. Shoulson) {[email protected]}
> To: TLHINGAN @ INTERNET (Multiple recipients of list) {[email protected]}
> Send reply to: TLHINGAN @ INTERNET {[email protected]}
> Subject: Re: {-bogh} vs {-meH}
> >Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 07:32:02 -0800
> >From: Chester Braun <[email protected]>
>
> >> > Qatlhbe' pong
> >> > Qatlh pong 'e' mojlI'
> >> > ^^^^^^
> >> >
> >> > (boy I hope this turned out right!)
> >>
> >> Well, unfortunately you lost *me*. I was trying to say was "My
> >> family would APPARENTLY disagree" - referring humorously to my
> >> three-syllable <tlhIgnan pong>. From the first part of your reply, I
> >> get "[the or a] name is not difficult". The second part is where I
> >> am not certain. Are you saying "The name is becoming difficult" ?
> >>
>
> >HIja'
>
> >I figured out what you were saying without too much of a problem.
> >I was trying to say that more than two syllables is not always difficult it is
> >just becoming difficult.
>
Just because something is difficult doesn't mean it isn't done. I
have a friend from Thailand whose name is Jamorn Rattanakulwattana
and a friend from Indonesia whose name is Setiawati Wongsongwidjoyo.
Qapla'
Qogh.
>
> ~mark
>