tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 27 15:17:23 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "inspite of"
- From: [email protected] (David Barron)
- Subject: Re: "inspite of"
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 16:10:46 -0600 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Matt Whiteacre" at Sep 27, 94 11:47:10 am
>
> The trouble is the {-be'} can not follow a type 9 suffix.
>
> >As in:
> >
> >tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom vIghajbe'mo'be' mu'tlheghvam vIghItlhlaHbej.
> >
>
> I would say:
>
> tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom vIghajbe' 'ach mu'tlheghvam vIghItlhlaHbej.
>
> >Well guys do you think this works?
> >
> >--
> >David Barron || [email protected] || lup Hoch yIyInqu'
> Matt Whiteacre
Qu'vatlh!
vaj tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom vIghajbe'DI' jIvalqu'be'. chaq tugh jIghoj.
--
David Barron || [email protected] || lup Hoch yIyInqu'
Klingon Language Postal Course || qaStaHvIS wa' lup
P.O. Box 37, Eagle ID 83616 || yInpu' wa'netlh yInmey
IT'S FREE!!! Send S.A.S.E (Not available by e-mail so dont't ask!)