tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Sep 03 05:07:27 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
-choHmoH
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: -choHmoH
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 94 17:03:22 EDT
Rambling through old mail, I saw a message quoting two examples
from the Useful Klingon Expressions in TKD:
nuqDaq waqwIj vIlamHa'choHmoH
Du'IHchoHmoH mIvvam
I found this interesting, in the light of recent discussions
with Guido#1 and his reading of {-moH} as always implying
{-choH}, and so {-choHmoH} is never acceptable as a combination
of suffixes, in Guido's opinion. Yet, there we are with two
examples. Is Okrand wrong in both examples?
Inquiring minds wish to know. Discussion, anyone?
charghwI'