tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 28 10:35:29 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Ahem.
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Ahem.
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 94 13:35:23 EST
As I walked to lunch, something in the back of my mind kept
tickling... something about an article by Krankor addressing
the whole nuqDaq question thing. I think my Humble Opinion just
got a little more humble.
On second thought (and I expect to think on this one AT LEAST 3
times), perhaps the word sequence should be as it is in TKD,
though the topicalizer is probably there more as a sign of
emphasis (as in URGENCY) than as the noun pronoun noun'e'
construction dictates. If this is true, then the phrase would
be equally correct as:
nuqDaq 'oH puchpa'?
Again, nuqDaq is a locative and not the object of {'oH}.
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |