tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 06 19:33:54 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: The suffix -ghach



You wrote: 

>
>This is the way <I> have basically been going with -wI' and -ghach (and 
I
>think it's pretty close).
>
>-wI' is simple, it's like adding "-er" to the verb, just as it says in 
TKD.
>HoHwI' is HoH + wI', and means "killer".  Klingon, however, is not 
specific
>(and English isn't either, really) as to whether or not a HoHwI' would 
be a
>person or thing which kills, or a thing that would be USED by a person 
to
>kill something.
>
>
>
>
>The other question that isn't answered is whether or not verbial 
prefixes could
>be used on a -ghach construction, which would make something like "you 
killing
>him is bad" as simple as "qab DaHoHghach", but I don't think anyone 
here would
>really say that would be correct.
>
>..Paul
>
>PS>  If I confused you, oops.  :)
>
>
>
If -gach makes a noun out of a verb, then one shouldn't be able to use 
verbial prefixes or suffixes with the resulting construction.  My 
question would be are noun suffixes O.K. after -ghach?
				Ken




Back to archive top level