tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 28 05:22:34 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ramvam
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ramvam
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 1994 18:18:43 -0400 (EDT)
>>>wa' Hu' ram "Boston"Daq pawpu' jupwI' ngo'.
>
>>Qanqoroy!!!!
>>SoHmo' jItuHqu'!
>>wa' mu' neH 'oH <wa'Hu'>'e' 'e' DaSovqu'!!! {{:)
>
>qarchu'be'. cha' mu' 'oHlaHbej. tImugh; Qapba' bIH.
bIQaghpu' not vIjatlh.
chotuHmoHpu' vIjatlh. {{:)
>'ach qaq wa' mu' 'e' vIQochbe'chu'.
lu'! cha' mu' ghoSchoH wa' mu', qar'a'?
Oh, neat... another of those discussions-about-Klingon-in-Klingon!
Translations:
------------
I never said you erred.
I said you embarassed me. :)
Of course! The one word comes from the two words, doesn't it?
--HoD trI'Qal