tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 21 00:20:46 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch



Matthew Whiteacre wrote and charghwI' responds:
> Subject: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
> 
> wejleS QelHo' vISuch

     Am I the only person who would have expected {Ho'Qel} instead of
{QelHo'}? Perhaps it makes no difference? {Ho'Qel DaSuchtaHvIS bIDo'jaj}

> Ho'wIj tI'

     Ho'lIj tI'qu' Ho'Qel QaQ 'e' vItul

> cha'maHben ragh Ho'

     Ho' qab DaghajmeH nI'qu' cha'maH DIS

> tI'ghach ngo' vIchIl

     DaSopbe'pu' 'e' vItul

> vaghHu' raghghach tu' QelHo'

     qaStaHvIS chorgh jaj 'oy' DabuSlaH

     yItIv



Back to archive top level