tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 21 00:20:46 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
- From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 94 13:18:46 EST
Matthew Whiteacre wrote and charghwI' responds:
> Subject: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
>
> wejleS QelHo' vISuch
Am I the only person who would have expected {Ho'Qel} instead of
{QelHo'}? Perhaps it makes no difference? {Ho'Qel DaSuchtaHvIS bIDo'jaj}
> Ho'wIj tI'
Ho'lIj tI'qu' Ho'Qel QaQ 'e' vItul
> cha'maHben ragh Ho'
Ho' qab DaghajmeH nI'qu' cha'maH DIS
> tI'ghach ngo' vIchIl
DaSopbe'pu' 'e' vItul
> vaghHu' raghghach tu' QelHo'
qaStaHvIS chorgh jaj 'oy' DabuSlaH
yItIv