tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 09 15:42:23 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
"Each ship has one captain" (was: re: {-moH})
- From: [email protected] (Marnen Laibow-Koser )
- Subject: "Each ship has one captain" (was: re: {-moH})
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 94 4:37:53 EST
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Feb 7, 94 10:29 am
jatlhta' ~mark:
:
: >On Feb 4, 4:20pm, joy'wI' wrote and charghwI' responds:
[...]
: >> Also: how does one say "per" as in "there is one captain per ship"?
:
: > wa' HoD neH ghaj Dujmey Hoch
:
: This works (I believe marqoS put the neH in front; charghwI' is right. It
: goes after), tho it seems to me more likely to be understood that all the
: ships collectively have one captain (especially if you conjugate the verb
: correctly and use "lughaj"). Truly, though, in most situations even the
: powerful ambiguity here would probably be ok. You could also do "wa' HoD
: neH ghaj wa' Duj" (one ship has one captain; this has the ambiguity that
: you may not be talking about the ships in general, but that's also a very
: minor thing. Natural languages simply aren't unambiguous). Maybe
: something bizarre like "wa' Duj HoD ghaH wa' loD'e' neH". I think I like
: "wa' HoD neH ghaj wa' Duj" best.
How about >wa' HoD ghajbej wa' Duj Hoch< -- "every 1 ship has [exactly, hence
the >-bej< -- or should that be >-chu'<?] 1 captain"?
:
: ~mark
:
:
Qapla' jachqemwi'vo'.
--
===============================================================================
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | Marnen E.
| |/ \ \ / \ \ / \ \ | |/ \_\ | |/ \ \ / \_\ | |/ \ \ | Laibow-Koser
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |/ | | | | | laibow@brick.
|_| |_| |_| \_\|_| |_| |_| |_| \_\_/ |_| |_| | purchase.edu
| SUNY Purchase
===============================================================================