tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 08 22:41:56 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Adams Family Motto:



>From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
>Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 11:07:52 EST

>On Feb 9, 12:12am, Nick NICHOLAS wrote:

>> ...For example, vision (and this might be a bit
>> overreacting on my part) has changed from leghlaHghach to leghwI'laH,
>> the ability of a seer.

>Sorry, Nick. You can't nominalize a verb and then use a verb suffix on
>it. Once you add {-wI'} the word is a noun, and as such cannot accept {-laH}.
>{legh} is a verb. {leghwI'} is a noun. {leghwI'laH} is a non-word. That is
>not to say that your non-word is not interesting. The tumbling thoughts it
>creates are quite nice. It just doesn't happen to nearly follow the
>grammatical rules of Klingon.

Sorry, charghwI', but Nick's right.  His compound is ok.  You missed
another meaning of "laH".  It isn't just a verb-suffix; it's also a noun in
its own right, meaning "ability".  So "leghwI'laH" is a compound word of
"leghwI'" plus "laH", meaning "seer's ability" (noun-noun construction,
in one compound word, like jolpa')

>charghwI'


~mark



Back to archive top level