tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 06 06:32:34 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: pronouns as verbs

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: pronouns as verbs
• Date: Sun, 06 Feb 1994 19:31:10 -0500 (EST)

Considering the statement that pronouns can only have noun suffixes: I hate to
say it but it's wrong. Section 6.3, page 68. "pa'wIjDaq jIHtaH" and "pa'DajDaq
ghaHtaH la''e'" are both presented as examples of pronouns substituting the
verb "to be". While most persons on this list might not take advantage of this
fact, it's still available. Thus I must ask again: is "jIghaH" permissable? I
would say yes. But then again, it would make writing my translator easier, so
I'm biased.

        joy'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • pronouns as verbs
    • From: [email protected] (Mark E. Shoulson)

• Prev by Date: THIS JULY!!!!!
• Next by Date: Love Boat: The Next Generation
• Prev by thread: pronouns as verbs
• Next by thread: pronouns as verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level