tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 11 16:05:08 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Adverbials
According to Terry Donnelly:
>
>
> William H. Martin writes:
> >
> > According to R. B. Franklin:
> >>
> >> Have you seen any canon examples that indicate whether you can negate
> >> adverbials?...
> >
> > While it would be enormously useful, no, there is no canon and
> > no grammatical justification for doing this.
>
> What about {Do'} and {Do'Ha'}? (the latter is on p. 171 in TKD).
{Do'} is both an adverbial AND a verb (as if it were two
different words with similar meaning, but different grammatical
functions). {Do'Ha'} is translated as "It is unfortunate,"
which is clearly the verbal use of the word {Do'} with the
{-Ha'} verbal suffix. If it were being used as an adverbial
here, it would need another verb. It stands alone.
> P.S. Really nice summary of grammar, charghwI', in your last post.
qatlho'.
> P.P.S. I'm adopting a *nom de Hol* for the list; from now on just call me
> {ter'eS}
Welcome, ter'eS.
> ter'eS
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |