tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 30 10:57:53 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: maghwI'pu'

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: maghwI'pu'
• Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 22:53:45 EDT
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9408301455.A12504-0100000@netcom10>; from "R.B Franklin" at Aug 30, 94 2:50 pm

According to R.B Franklin:
> 
> vInIDqa':
> luHoHlu'ta'bogh maghwI'pu' chaH maghwI'pu' QaQ'e' neH.
> 
> lugh 'e' vItul.
> 
> yoDtargh

Closer. Ever closer. But not quite. The {-lu'} suffix is
somewhat tricky. That first mention of traitors needs to be the
OBJECT of the verb {HoH}. You've placed it as the subject.
Reverse the first two words, and I think you are on to
something.

charghwI'

• References:
  • Re: KLBC: maghwI'pu'
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Translate *that* sentence...
• Next by Date: tlhIngan "joke"
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: maghwI'pu'
• Next by thread: Re: Star Trek VI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level