tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 15 08:01:20 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: chu'wi' jIH
- From: d'Armond Speers <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: chu'wi' jIH
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 1994 19:57:21 -0400 (EDT)
I said:
> > Something like, {poH nI' yIQongbe'}.
and ~mark replied:
> Just one point here, Holtej, that needs to be made both on the original
> *and* your correction. You don't use "-be'" on imperatives. That should
> be "yIQongQo'".
Hagh qoHpu' neH HeghtaHvIS SuvwI'pu'
> ~mark, Grammarian doing the rare pulling-rank thing and feeling a little
> weird about it.
Actually, I'm surprised you don't do it more often (correct me, that
is). I know I've slipped in my interpretations from time to time, and
I just figured you (and others) were just being gracious.
--Holtej the Fallible