tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 15 08:01:20 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: chu'wi' jIH



I said:

> > Something like, {poH nI' yIQongbe'}.

and ~mark replied:

> Just one point here, Holtej, that needs to be made both on the original
> *and* your correction.  You don't use "-be'" on imperatives.  That should
> be "yIQongQo'".

Hagh qoHpu' neH HeghtaHvIS SuvwI'pu'

> ~mark, Grammarian doing the rare pulling-rank thing and feeling a little
> weird about it.

Actually, I'm surprised you don't do it more often (correct me, that 
is).  I know I've slipped in my interpretations from time to time, and 
I just figured you (and others) were just being gracious.  

--Holtej the Fallible



Back to archive top level