tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 09 04:03:44 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: {-ta'} vs {-lI'}



Guidovo':
...
> You seem to have neglected the key sentence to the analogy: "It is possible
> to consider {-lI'} a /continuous/ counterpart of {-ta'}, and {-taH} a
> /continuous/ counterpart of {-pu'}." (TKD, 4.2.7, pg.43, emphasis not 
> added).

charghwI'vo':
     Gee. I guess you're right. Yes. I am convinced. Thank you for yet
another enlightenment.



Back to archive top level