tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 09 04:03:44 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {-ta'} vs {-lI'}
- From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {-ta'} vs {-lI'}
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 94 16:01:30 EDT
Guidovo':
...
> You seem to have neglected the key sentence to the analogy: "It is possible
> to consider {-lI'} a /continuous/ counterpart of {-ta'}, and {-taH} a
> /continuous/ counterpart of {-pu'}." (TKD, 4.2.7, pg.43, emphasis not
> added).
charghwI'vo':
Gee. I guess you're right. Yes. I am convinced. Thank you for yet
another enlightenment.