tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 07 04:21:41 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: qajatlh

• From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: qajatlh
• Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 16:17:31 -0400 (EDT)

Holtejvo':


>qorvo'
>
>> wo' Degh boghaj'a'?
>
>HIja', Degh vIghaj.
>
>> naDev Degh DalI''a'?
>
>pa' 'oH vIlI'laH.
>nuqDaq DaneH 'e' choja'.

Ewwww!  I don't like that last sentence... primarily because it looks like it 
should have an imperative prefix on <ja'>.  I will buy the double-object for 
<ja'>, and the use of nuqDaq, but I would have just simply said:  nuqDaq 
DaneH?  Much simpler. {{:)


--HoD trI'Qal

• Prev by Date: KLBC: qajatlh
• Next by Date: Re: yIwuQ!
• Prev by thread: KLBC: qajatlh
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: qajatlh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level