tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 06 17:11:10 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Bhagavad, Part 2
- From: [email protected] (Nick NICHOLAS)
- Subject: Re: Bhagavad, Part 2
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 94 19:08:35 EST
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Topic Goran" at Apr 1, 94 3:12 pm
Hu'tegh! nuq ja' Topic Goran jay'?
=jatlh nIchyon:
=> =24.
=> =jatlh *Sanjaya'*:
=> =*ba'rata'* puqloD, jatlhDI' QongnISbe'wI',
=> =cha' mangghom joj jaH lupwI''a' qaSmoH nochta'.
=> Again, left out the "'e'".
=nuqjatlh??? vIyajlaHbe'. "'e'" vItu'laHbe'.
"'e'" Datu'laHbe', mu'tlheghDaq "'e'" tu'lu'be'mo' ;) . *'e'* qaSmoH nochta'.
cha' mangghom joj jaH lupwI''a' is one sentence, and 'e' qaSmoH nochta' the
other.
=> =26.
=> =cha' mangghom jojDaq Qambogh vavpu' vavnI'pu' je
=> =SovchoHmoHwI'pu' SoSloDnI'pu' loDnI'pu' puqloDpu' puqloD puqloDpu' juppu' je
=> =be'nalvavpu' QaQwI'pu' je tu' *parta* puqloD.
=> Conjunctions are a good thing.
=puSqu' tay'moHbogh mu'meywIj 'e' DaHar'a'?
Yes, the more so since you do not use punctuation.
=> =29.
=> =jotHa' rowIj je, 'ej gheghchoH DIrwIj;
=> =*ghanDI'wa'* jIchaghtaH, 'ej tujqu' je DIr.
=> Should be vIchagh.
=moHaqmo' Dalughbej. 'ach qatlh {-taH} vIlo'laHbe'?
=wot "frequentative" vInIDpu'. "I keep dropping G" vIHech.
In that case, I think reH is better. -taH is not frequentative, it's
imperfective. In most languages imperfective aspect is conscripted to
express frequentative, but Klingon isn't necessarily one of them. English
isn't --- hence "keep dropping" vs. "am dropping".
=> =30.
=> =DaH naDev jIQamlaHbe', 'ej jIlIj'egh.
=> =*qe'DI*HoHwI', Hoch vIleghHa'qu'bej.
=> Should be *qe'DI* HoHwI'.
=qarqu'.
Well, doesn't *have* to be, but it would be clearer.
The rest is in the file in the ftp archive.
--
Nick.