tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 19 14:10:38 1993
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: More on Greater Than/Less Than
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: More on Greater Than/Less Than
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 93 17:10:21 EDT
>From: Will Martin <email@example.com>
>On Oct 18, 11:47am, Paul J. Clegg wrote:
>> Subject: More on Greater Than/Less Than
> This is where you went astray. This sort of Logical extrapolation is not
>a valid way to extend the Klingon language. You have sought to figure out WHY
>the comparitive structure exists as it does and then extend from that
>explanation to say a lot of things Okrand never said in TKD. Unfortunately,
>you have no license to do this. None of us do. Only Okrand could leap that
>far to explain how this construction could do anything it doesn't do in TKD
Geez, it wasn't like I was planning on publishing "Paul Clegg's Klingon
Companion", I was just speculating...
>> tuQoch'a'? tuQochbe''a'?
> I don't just disagree. I'm right. You are wrong. Period.
Yes, Mr. Okrand Jr. :)
We GOTTA get Okrand on the list; I'm sure if he were to "okay" various things
we suggest, we'd have a huge volume of Klingon information... :)