tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 25 13:04:43 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
• Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:04:09 -0400
• In-reply-to: <ACF6622D959A8842A81E4471BA56A7E001F0298B@xm-mbx-04-prod.ad.uchicago.edu>
• List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
• List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
• List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <ACF6622D959A8842A81E4471BA56A7E001F0298B@xm-mbx-04-prod.ad.uchicago.edu>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> This raises the question:  What's the difference between {waQ} "obstruct" and {bot} "prevent, block, etc."?

My own impression of the difference is that {waQ} implies an object
being physically in the way, while {bot} refers to keeping a goal from
being achieved.

-- ghunchu'wI'

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

• References:
  • [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
    • From: qurgh lungqIj <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
• Next by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
• Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
• Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: waQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level