tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 10 09:28:00 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?

De'vID jonpIn ([email protected])

• From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
• Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:27:50 +0200
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZsagiGwMEI8EKb5haiokGVEVG1yG56L1BM1+r3PDCKA=; b=ZJBjlOK2gXPmIA8B+lbclejY8hjHZBO7AdyWFwsgBKLEIfuTrJhgyH67qyR2On1eRY aDp8G4OvbG6oKXhdmucdgbydk1hOUIWIMyf6TEEHkSQn89m1WEw5h4HpFyUcBBZhNjee DFgAfPpv4Wbx9nzU0U2Louysa5HSjMyQvH4JI+z319my5YDfhLsxx8ux66tvoGpZc6Ob PXiyQb69A7NMmXwjm17EVxWCLLUz6DO2J7DjGo+Y3CSembHP2vCJRccHLtOlSsSfIZ7M INsZ447T2ekj95V5Rtc67BTqESy+Nelyho+OWFJ2HeuOr9MluAprHxq09sKLJuJOHItt B07A==
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
• List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
• List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• References: <CA+7zAmOzCnCVNgUzUNuOfOr0Rqg1Aoi3swTMWQ88Lnj+soT+=A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

<p><br>
Quvar:<br>
&gt;&gt; On proof for this is the slang expression {Ho&#39;} for &quot;hero, idol&quot;, which<br>
&gt;&gt; will be {Ho&#39;Du&#39;} and {Ho&#39;wIj} even when used to refer to a person.</p>
<p>SuStel:<br>
&gt; There are many examples of this. Another is how pot handles are called {DeSqIvDu&#39;}, even though they&#39;re not body parts.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Using a word or suffix appropriate to the referent instead of the noun may not be wrong, but it will call strong attention to what you&#39;ve done.</p>
<p>maj.  It seems clear it would be {wIvwIj} even if {wIv} referred to a person.</p>
<p>A related question: is it {cha&#39;DIchwI&#39;} because {cha&#39;DIch} in this sense refers to a person (i.e., it isn&#39;t quite the same word as the ordinal number &quot;second&quot;), or is it {cha&#39;DIchwIj} (because it&#39;s the same word as the number and follows the logic of {wIv})?</p>

<p>--<br>
De&#39;vID<br>
</p>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

• References:
  • [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
    • From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
    • From: Lieven Litaer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
• Next by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
• Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
• Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] being capable of language suffix class - property of noun, or referent?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level