tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 16 19:54:44 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh wejmaH wej: pumDI' lojmIt

Robyn Stewart ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



My mailer has made a hash out of what my phone sent. Re-edited here.

At 05:55 '?????' 7/16/2012, you wrote:
On 2012-07-15, at 23:16, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <[email protected]> wrote:

> pay' vay' qaw vajar: not Hota'ro' ngaghmeH tlhobta' vajar.
I'm not sure I like the {X-meH tlhob} construction; it feels a lot like an Englishism, "he asked to X" rendered directly into Klingon. It might just be my instincts, of course; I'd've gone with ngagh 'e' tlhob.

> I'll think about that one.

Thought about it and remembered one reason it isn't ngagh 'e' tlhob. I needed the perfective to be very unambiguous on tlhobta'. Not he didn't habitually, not he wasn't going to, but he never had propositioned her for sex. I don't know if it helps your instinct any to know that "he asked to X" is marked speech in my idiolect of English. It sounds like the translation of something on a language learning tape, as opposed to something someone would say. I was definitely going for he hadn't growled at her for the purpose of mating, but used tlhob, because we don't have a verb "make a low sound like a chemvaH."

The placement of {not}, however, was an error and has been corrected.

>> vajar SaHqu'pu' 'ej puqchaj boghmoH neHbejpu'. > > As ghunchu'wI' pointed out not long ago, since verb-neH is in many ways > parallel to X 'e' Y, an aspect suffix may not be able to appear on neH > in this kind of construct. I'll leave that up to you, though. bepwI'pu' vIQuchmoH vIneH.

I made it:{puqchaj boghmoH neHbej, Heghpa'.} I kind of needed that perfective. yatlhtaHvIS vajar be'nal cha'DIch, Hegh.

pa' lu'elDI' Dachlaw' qImyal. pa' DojmoH Dochmey wagh. > > Ugh... if this were in English I'd tell you to buy a thesaurus. :P "The > expensive things" seems a bit blah.

Thought about this more in the air today. You can read it as expensive things, expensive objects, objects d'art ...

- Qov



_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol



Back to archive top level