tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 02 03:46:26 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions

Philip Newton ([email protected])

From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:45:55 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=PtVVyRjm9hx982Eax9GqGC82R4c8DkgkHhSvN1hz3SQ=; b=Zx+gJ+6jCXfgALy64dcmcNYIs9+D6TD+5ASD5/9BSF/JpSW4GOQw0ECJMT184cjUJa EQb7jx8Df39By6Hanfw4D++Cer/GpIBXFe7jADReb97535GXJfZGEMNriyuz7WEQTHUi Z/1xAKKO3ZK8kzYNCAatrZIayCzJFaj0qhCf+llbx9PZ/fNCFVDUoT8jnh2gvIaYPjxD lzG6bERQKq5T08XDB/6CA+8WJPCCdjtpPWvvbwBai78vYZeII/0PD6f6HjsehhdV8ypl 4v/vLTIkOTWvtD4x+97KMufDjVhaOeGaOyqX72L0XUBo/qJOc/vDvc5IY2dvxMP8B5FB lXvg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <CA+cwSm_UMMoG41Mo7++DJt3nuGYT76WgqiW4MnsVr_WbQYF0=g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA+7zAmNziqy6rf7zsfdjt8TMj9ZjE+YFX5G+3xoCMmHptb8oJQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA+7zAmO5-vhxSWy+r2DZUdYAGzarwKV-0tZi8=A2RjFkKkPG7A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 20:14, Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> After all, we have phrases like {nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'.}, with puchpa''e' as the subject of 'oH.

Hm. I wonder whether it is the subject of {'oH}, or merely an
adverbial for the phrase that happens to be in that position rather
than at the front.

Is there a difference between {nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'} and {puchpa''e'
nuqDaq 'oH}? (The latter in the sense of {HaqwI''e' DaH yISam}.)

Though TKDa 6.7 gives that sentence as an example of how an adverbial
such as {DaH} "when the object noun is topicalized by means of the
noun suffix {-'e'}".

So I guess it's the {DaH} that's mobile there rather than the {HaqwI''e'}.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

References:
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
  - From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
  - From: Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
  - From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
  - From: Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: 'unyan 'oQqar
Next by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: ghuv
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
Index(es):