tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 21 14:16:55 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KTH - vI'angta''a'?
- From: Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KTH - vI'angta''a'?
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:15:06 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US, sv-SE
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AQHL6ALLWQMyfCy/5Uu+TaOcCt+RV5Q4SACJ
- Thread-topic: KTH - vI'angta''a'?
>> chablIjDaq ghew tu'be'lu'jaj!
> qatlho'.
> 'ach, "ghew" vIpar.
> (Although, I don't like "ghew" for bug. Unless you meant the insect?)
Not terribly fond of that neologism, myself (I figure Qagh should already cover that concept, anyway), but I just couldn't resist that double entendre ;)
HoD: qatlh choQ loSDaq tlhuHlaHbe' beq?
yaS: muD ngeb SeHwI' patDaq qagh tu'lu'!
HoD: *Qagh* Dajatlh 'e' DaHech.
yaS: ghobe'. *qagh*.