tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 22 08:38:52 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Context

Robyn Stewart ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



So how would people who didn't know it explain?  Imagine some native 
English speakers with no linguistic education trying to explain to a 
non-native speaker why a word ...

* means different things in different situations --> jaS 'oS choHDI' ghu'
* has to be explained or else it is rude ---> mu'vetlh QIjlu'be'chugh Doch
* only makes sense with other words ---> yajmeH vay', tlhejnIS boQbogh mu'

more?

Like so many other questions in Klingon, I guess this one has to be 
answered with "the translation depends on the context."

DamughlaHpa' mu' ghu' DayajnIS. Hoch ghu'vaD jaS mughlu'.

At 08:11 22/07/2011, you wrote:
>"Context" seems like a jargon term; I don't think I've ever seen it 
>used outside of linguistics or literacy teaching. Probably neither 
>of which Maltz is very familiar with.
>
>-- ter'eS
>
>--- On Fri, 7/22/11, lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Context
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Friday, July 22, 2011, 6:22 AM
> > Given how often Okrand has explained
> > that aspects of the language requires context to comprehend
> > detail, it is ironic that he has not given us a word for
> > "context".
> >
> > lojmit tI'wI'nuv
> >
> > Sent from my iPod
> >
> >
> >







Back to archive top level