tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 25 08:33:30 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: idea for writing system

Lawrence John Rogers ([email protected])



Well, all writing systems are phonetic. 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Lawrence John Rogers wrote: 
> 
>> nuqneH?!?
> 
> tlhIngan Hol wIjatlhqu' vIneH jay'. 
> 
>> A while ago I had this idea for the Klingon Writing System.  The  
>> pdf file
>> supplied by KLI under Writing Klingon shows a disconnect between  
>> the show's
>> writing system and the language as-known.  The pdf article by Dr.  
>> Schoen
>> implies that perhaps Klingon has more than an alphabetic set of  
>> characters.
> 
> The Klingon Dictionary tells us that those people who pronounce {b}  
> and {m} the same must remember the proper spelling of words.  This  
> implies that other people do not, and that the spelling in {pIqaD} is  
> phonetic. 
> 
> wabmey 'oS Deghmey 'e' chup tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom. 
> 
>> Anybody like the idea or have any scholarly, serious ideas for what  
>> where
>> this writing system should head?
> 
> For my purposes, Klingon is a spoken language.  The writing system  
> used is merely a way to record and transmit speech.  We have one  
> absolutely official writing system that everyone here can use (the  
> Romanized transcription from TKD), we have one officially unusable  
> writing system (the symbols seen on television), and we have an  
> unofficial but popular blend of the two (using a collection of the TV  
> symbols to represent specific sounds). 
> 
> tlhIngan Hol jatlhqu'nISlu'.  QIch qon pIqaD 'e' vIHarchu'.  naDev  
> TKD ghItlhmeH pat lo' Hoch.  Hov leng much pat lo'laHbe' vay'.  rut  
> pIqaDqoq lo'lu'. 
> 
> Since you're the one proposing a new system, it's up to you to  
> determine its direction. 
> 
> patlIj chu' DaSeHnIS SoH. 
> 
>>   Something constructive instead of
>> insulting or destructive this time would be appropriate,  
>> considering I'm on
>> my way to learning the language and berating all my ideas just  
>> gives me (and
>> everyone else who reads these posts) a bad, bad taste.
> 
> I propose that if you're merely "on your way to learning the  
> language", you are not yet in a position to suggest changes or  
> additions that will be taken seriously by those who have already  
> learned it well enough to converse with each other. 
> 
> wej tlhIngan Hol DajatlhlaHchugh, DachoH wej 'e' Dabaj jay'. 
> 
> My constructive suggestion is for you to study the language as we  
> know it, to learn to communicate using the established vocabulary and  
> grammar (and writing system), and only then to give serious thought  
> to reformations or supplements. 
> 
> yIghoj.  yIQum.  ghIq choHmey tIqelchoH. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
>  
> 
 


Canidate for Linguistics B.A. at
Michigan State University 

404 E. Owen Hall
East Lansing, MI 48825
Cell:1-906-370-3624 








Back to archive top level