tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 16 13:01:14 2008
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
- From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: cha' Hol ngeb mu'ghommey Daj vItu'pu'!
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:42:55 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=2n6RybI6DUI059GWkNOMIEvKODRLpRRryTV2wYnLIJo=; b=J9J0Wjy84eoIWvrq8Nxf+bjCg2dC6mNdI/7Z1pOIkbMN4DlQ8Rt+0MKkACENCZzlYDD22naQ2H00N/eMI1SUw6DgNqBHIgzNaa6beo5XJbmHGXUgLEVzHBNrPkfGU/B1j/EFvJG6Qlh/wAZQbgIN2kPBCrWj13E1YjeLVV/CI4E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mL+XvD5RSi6dBuCPk4bR3s3LO6Zja7tI46Zti2uGBACDEQSl2+tmp/75/RyCiSntMA/4z1F456ZoAKmPXrsoe+gjhKNa71o1MEr2eDJmYMVU3oUdw82z16Dyz4p75oq1VHfFDyhtnVLhKby6RrrcWNiU/yxzBaWah3Y1MK95Nq0=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Well, the term "constructed language", or "conlang" for short, is in
wide currency outside of the Klingon community; I see no reason not to
use it. It conveys the idea: someone sat down and constructed the
thing. It didn't just evolve naturally. You could also call it a
"planned language".
On the other hand, "planned language" could also refer to a language
that someone had planned to complete but never got around to.
Sindarin, anyone? :)
All languages may be artificial, but there's a difference between a
language that grows within a culture over time (centuries, millennia)
and one that a person or even a committee sits down to put together as
a conscious effort.
I don't like "imaginary language". tlhInan Hol may have been
"imagined" as the native language of an "imaginary" race, but that's
different from the language itself being imaginary...
--
Mark J. Reed <[email protected]>