tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 09 09:11:41 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:11:16 EDT

In a message dated 10/9/2006 11:06:32 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Although {qatlh} "why?" is perfectly fine, what's wrong with 
> intonation?  If you insist on adding a suffix, how about combining {'e'} 
> "topic" with intonation:  {SoH'e'?} "You (of all people)?!"
> 

Mostly because intonation is not a standard way of expressing a question (or 
anything else).  Intonation in Klingon grammar is unknown territory.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Translating Dilbert
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level