tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 21 05:19:42 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "type 0" suffixes

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: "type 0" suffixes
• Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:19:21 EST

In a message dated 3/21/2006 5:12:16 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> so {loD nal} 
> "man spouse" became {loDnal} "husband").
> 

As a noun-noun construction {loD nal} would mean "man's spouse", which 
addresses a possible area of Klingon culture not previously addressed to my 
knowledge (namely same-sex marriages).

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: acronyms in Klingon?
• Next by Date: Re: On a more humerous note (some may not think of this as funn
• Previous by thread: Re: "type 0" suffixes
• Next by thread: Re: "type 0" suffixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level