tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 20 13:11:36 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Undocumented (i think) suffixes (Type 0 suffix)
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Undocumented (i think) suffixes (Type 0 suffix)
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:11:23 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dkhH8W5CVp2PuYfsDsG5t3faud1T0nuW3yaHMlMXEAsh0DimJeVrQjkcxvkNCjSif5nZIwMkbp7PtjFbKSyU5OLvK5uOGBOfK6R7htOIuX8tR3OgPhuiGNB2opgW+bjLr+aRNq1ys6WEn/rbc05ylLOl3B+0nsi2cf7rOvPnC/k= ;
When making the chatspeak thing i noticed something. I noticed that a few related words in english were related in klingon, but moreso in klingon than english, thus showing a possible relation to each other.
be' - Female
be'nal - wife
be'nI' - Sister
Now just looking those up, i went through the analyzer on mu' HaqwI' and noticed that when i tested the following, it never acknowledged the loD part as a seperate entity and the suffix as a sperated entity... Despite little importance of identifying it, i figured it might give clues to some future words if we can find more suffixes like this on other words that are not documented.
loD - Male
loDnal - husband
loDnI' - brother
The so far identified type 0 suffixes:
-nal (married)
-nI' (co-sibling)
technically, one would call your clone a vavnI' or a SoSvI'.
this also creates a whole new line of humanlike insults...
vavnallI' chay'? (How is your parter (who happens to be yourself) doing?)
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.