tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 24 20:49:53 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bel

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: bel
• Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:49:34 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' naHQun wrote:

> Based on the words {'uH} and {wuQ}, Klingon would have a simple  
> verb for
> this, but since Okrand hasn't revealed it yet does this make sense: ?
> belHom bel bel'a'

I don't know if it makes sense for what you're carefully not telling  
us.  I infer a meaning of something like "increasing pleasure".

> suggestions?

Instead of {ghaj} or {Hot}, which I agree don't work well, how about  
{SIQ} or {tIv}?

> (oh, and I purposly avoided translating my English phrase to try to be
> polite.)

What you intend is not clear.  What do you think about replacing the  
whole phrase with {Qom}?

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bel
    • From: naHQun <[email protected]>

• References:
  • bel
    • From: naHQun <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: bel
• Next by Date: Re: hi !
• Previous by thread: RE: bel
• Next by thread: Re: bel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level