tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 16 08:49:16 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*
• Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:48:27 EDT

In a message dated 7/16/2006 10:42:58 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> taQqu'!  not lo'vam vIleghpu'.  Qapbe' 'e' vIQub.  Despite the "be"  
> in "be born", I don't believe {bogh} is a verb of quality.  It looks  
> like you're trying to use it as if it meant live-bearing as opposed  
> to egg-laying :)
> 

bIlughchu'.  
It fit perfectly, even if perhaps not correctly.  
qaq'a' <DevmeH bogh>?

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: pegh mu'
• Next by Date: Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*
• Previous by thread: Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*
• Next by thread: Re: *cha' qo'mey pIm*
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level