tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 12 14:17:28 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: easy question
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: easy question
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:17:01 EST
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 1/12/2006 3:28:02 PM Central Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> I don't think Okrand has ever used a number with one of those nouns with a
> different plural form, but I would opt for {loS mangpu'} if the actual
> number is important, particularly if it's a relatively low number.
cha' chovnatlhHeyvam vISamta':
{wa' DoS wIqIp}
We hit one target | We agree
[KGT 105,106]
{cha' DoSmey DIqIp}
We hit two targets | We disagree
[KGT 106]
lay'tel SIvten