tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 27 21:41:56 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Negative numbers

Russ Perry Jr ([email protected])

• From: Russ Perry Jr <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Negative numbers
• Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:43:01 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

At 7:36 PM -0800 2/27/06, Shane MiQogh wrote:
> I don't think there will be one. Considering the language is based
> on culture, Okrand might beleive there is no need for this since
> you'll pretty much go to hell if you do anything as dishonoring as
> getting yourself in debt.

Don't think money, think measurements.  Any race advanced enough to
get into space would pretty much HAVE TO understand negative numbers.

> Lieven Litaer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nobody has mentioned "below zero" yet:
>> {pagh bIng wa'}
>> "(the) below-zero-one" = -1
>>
>> Yes, as you said these will also need explanation until we get
>> official rules for that.
-- 
//*================================================================++
||  Russ Perry Jr   2175 S Tonne Dr #114   Arlington Hts IL 60005  ||
||   847-952-9729     [email protected]      VIDEOGAME COLLECTOR!   ||
++================================================================*//

• References:
  • Re: Negative numbers
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon word for "Bookmarklet"/"Favelet"?
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: poDmoH (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: Negative numbers
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: nga'chuq (verb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level