tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Feb 25 21:27:19 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC
• Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:27:07 -0800 (PST)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rnXB9hwvJWnsWVWOH8dnygLfmauW/EWF7dIYJmZELErJVQCGNyyhfnggHMCot/zQcqu+DTkiT4nHQRVa7dS0boM96uYfsLz8R6yA2Y9tJ5VwDlWjslhiMx+jxUBiAqiSuGIfBXoWWU5lY4Yh+AqK6N1zIshylmQtkIBJKZb3muw= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Most Klingon words (nouns, verbs, whatever) are
3 letters, CVC, long, but there's no rule that
they have to be.  Many words break that pattern.

-- ter'eS BG

--- Shane MiQogh <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm curious... I was told some where here (i THINK)
> that Klingon verbs were only 3 letters long...
> chargh is a klingon verb... now i know ch and gh are
> all one letter... but...
>    
>      ch = 1
>          a=1
>           r=1
>         gh=1
>   +________
>    
>            4
>    
>   chargh is 4 letters... What's with that? Or was
> that nouns that had to be 3... or was it both nouns
> and verbs.. i forget...
> 		
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a
> breeze. 
> 
> 
> 

• References:
  • KLBC
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon word for "Bookmarklet"/"Favelet"?
• Previous by thread: KLBC
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: ghoch (noun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level