tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 12 21:49:22 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'

Bryan Jones ([email protected])

• From: Bryan Jones <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:02:30 +1000
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

jatlh DloraH
> To me:
> tu'be'lu' negates the "discovering".  An entity does exist.
> tu'lu'be' negates the entity. Like in the well know question, "If a tree falls
> in the forest but there is no-one around to hear it, does it make a sound?"
> There is a lack of entity to do the hearing, instead of an entity present but
> does not hear it.

qatlho'. This is precisely the concept I was reaching for. DIvI'
Hol... yabwIj ghorlu'pu'
-- 
Bryan S. Jones
NightDaemon Enterprises
nightdaemon.co.nr
[email protected]

• References:
  • Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
    • From: DloraH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: juch (v)
• Previous by thread: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: jol (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level