tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 11 10:50:12 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:49:26 EDT

In a message dated 2004-10-11 12:13:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Personally, I am rather fond of {tu'lu'be'}. It gives the feeling that
> the item or situation it refers to may exist, while no-one has seen it
> so it is a hypothetical being discussed.
> 
> neH cha' DeQmeywIj
> 
> Se'noj
> 

As opposed to >tu'be'lu'<?

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
    • From: Bryan Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: jol (n)
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: qa'vIn (n)
• Previous by thread: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Next by thread: Re: -be'lu' vs. -lu'be'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level