tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 06 05:10:35 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?

christoph.pichlmann ([email protected])

• From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Date: 06 Oct 2004 14:09:53 +0200

=3Echristoph.pichlmann:
=3E=3E=3E nuqDaq tu'lu'laH?
=3E
=3Eyou have two type5 suffixes here.
=3Eliterally translated, this sounds like
=3E  =22where can it is found?=22

ghuy'cha' jay'=21
jIleghlaHbe'bej...
=22laH=22 vInejta', 'ach =22taH=22 vISampu' - 'ej vItu'be'...

Intended Meaning:

Damned.
I am blind, apparently. (The =22apparently=22 is meant to be ironic.)
I looked up =22laH=22, but found =22taH=22 and didn t notice it.


--------------

I found the word in the KLL part of KCD, but where's the sentence from?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: ngaDmoHwI' (n)
• Next by Date: Earthlings in Israel
• Previous by thread: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level