tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 27 04:44:05 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

*nuqDaqvo'

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: *nuqDaqvo'
• Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:43:14 EDT

If TKD didn't explicitly state that {nuqDaq} is {nuq} plus the type 5 noun 
suffix {-Daq}, I would have no trouble accepting it as a compound noun, capable 
of taking any other suffixes.  As it is, I don't see how we can get around it, 
until/unless contrary canon comes along.
lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: *nuqDaqvo'
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: *nuqDaqvo'
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: Qup (v)
• Next by Date: Re: Hol tam
• Previous by thread: Klingon WOTD: Qup (v)
• Next by thread: Re: *nuqDaqvo'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level