tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 25 19:18:02 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: canon pIqaD

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: canon pIqaD
• Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:17:03 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:
>And if you asume they're serifs, then no one can seem to agree on some of
>the basic shapes.  What, for instance, is the shape of what the KLI map uses
>for S?  Did you know that jI'qel and I write the j symbol (and others) in
>fundamentally different ways?

ram.  chay' "a" ghItlhlu'?  pImqu'laH "g" Deghmey 'ach beptaH pagh.

>The KLI's w, e, 1, and 2 are virtually indistinguishable when written by
>hand,...

teHchugh, vaj ghIHlaw' ghoplIj'e' pagh pujlaw' mInlIj'e'.  pImbej <w>wIj'e'
<e>wIj'e' je, 'ej tajvaj jej Hutlhbej <1> <2> je.

>and the q and Q are little better.

DaH jIQochbe'.  pImmeH <Q> lachnISlu' 'e' vItu'.

>t and v often have the same
>problem.  Depending on what you think the shape of j is, j and 6 are
>similar.

rur'eghlaH 'ach rapbe'bej.  le'be' tlhIngan pIqaDqoq wIqeltaHbogh;
rurqu''egh "l" "I" "1" je, 'ej pIj nIb "O" "0" je.

Sengbe' Sengqoqvam.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: canon pIqaD
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: canon pIqaD
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: WOT
• Next by Date: Re: canon pIqaD
• Previous by thread: RE: canon pIqaD
• Next by thread: RE: canon pIqaD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level