tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 08 13:30:15 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re: mu'qaDmey tIQ (was:Re: imperative + -jaj)
- From: "Christoph Pichlmann" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Re: mu'qaDmey tIQ (was:Re: imperative + -jaj)
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 22:16:35 +0200
- Bcc:
From: [email protected]
>But the first one, I picture someone is killed, only once, but his body is
>chopped into a thousand pieces, and a piece is put into each room. Not
>quite
>as glorious.
>
>DloraH
DaH, porghvo''e' lojpu'mo' qa', 'oH SaH pagh.
Now, that the spirit(soul) is gone from the body, no one cares about it(the
body) anymore.
I am not sure about the -'e'- in there, but I saw no other way to make sure
the -'oH- will bee seen as refering to -porghvo'-.
Also, is -loj- acceptable here? -ghoS- didn't seem fitting.
(Note: I'm not sure if the reply is fitting at all, as I may have
misinterpreted DloraH's reply - but I want to know how bad my sentence is,
anyway ;-)
Christoph
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}