tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 05 16:50:53 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: imperative + -jaj

Dar'Qang ([email protected])

• From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: imperative + -jaj
• Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:50:43 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 07:29 AM 7/4/2004, SuStel wrote:
>From: "Dar'Qang" <[email protected]>

[Soj'e' QeS lagh QInvaD jIjang.]

> > latlh ngoD wISovchu' maH'e': mejmeH SoQHom jatlhnISlu'meH <<Qapla'>> QaQ
> > law' <<"live long and prosper">> QaQ puS.  tlhoS verengan 'oH vulqangan
> > mu'tlhegh'e'.
>
>mejlu'DI' not vay' jatlhnISqu'lu'.  noH vIjaHpa' chaq vIja'lu' <Qapla'>.

Hmm.. ngoD DaDelbogh vISovchu'.  Sovvam vI'oSmeH mojaq <-nIS> 
vIlo'ta'.  Qapbe'law' lo'wIj.  jIqelqa'.


>verengan mu'tlhegh rurbe' vulqangan mu'tlheghvam.  cheplu'meH
>mIpqu'nISbe'lu'.

jIqID! monwI' Degh vIlo'be'pu'.



Dar'Qang 

• References:
  • imperative + -jaj
    • From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
  • Re: imperative + -jaj
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: imperative + -jaj
• Next by Date: Re: qepHom in Indianapolis, Indiana: Saturday, July 10, 2004
• Previous by thread: Re: imperative + -jaj
• Next by thread: Re: imperative + -jaj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level